My students and I are interested primarily in the representation and processing of relations. Along with language, the ability to perceive, represent and reason about relations is the major factor distinguishing human thinking from the cognitive abilities of all other animals: It is what makes us the dominant species on the planet. How can neural architectures (brains or artificial neural networks) generate, represent and manipulate relational structures? How does the human mind's solution to this problem manifest itself in observable behavior? My collaborators, students and I investigate these issues in several domains. One line of research concerns the representation of relational structure in visual perception: How do we represent the relations among an object's parts or features? Under what circumstances, and in what form, will we explicitly encode these relations, and how does our encoding affect the manner in which we recognize and categorize objects? What is the role of visual attention in the representation of object shape? We address these questions both empirically, by conducting experiments on object perception, recognition and categorization with human subjects, and theoretically, by developing and testing computational (symbolic neural network) models of object perception and recognition. Another line of research concerns the representation and processing of relational information in thinking and reasoning. We have developed a symbolic neural network model--LISA (Learning and Inference with Schemas and Analogies; Hummel & Holyoak, 1997, 2003, Psychological Review)--of analogical mapping, analogy- and rule-based inference, and schema induction. We recently generalized the LISA model to account for aspects of cognitive development, especially the development of relational concepts and relational representations (the DORA model; Doumas, Hummel & Sandhofer, 2008, Psych. Review). Our group is also interested in how adults learn relational concepts and categories -- especially relational categories that have a "family resemblance" structure, in which no single relation is shared by all members of the category. We also investigate how people generate explanations, and how the resulting explanations affect judgements of likelihood. In this domain, as in the others, we both build computational models and conduct experiments with human subjects.
PhD, University of Minnesota
Bringsjord, S., Govindarajulu, N. S., Banerjee, S., & Hummel, J. E. (2018). Do Machine-Learning Machines Learn? In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (pp. 136-157). (Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics; Vol. 44). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_14
Hummel, J. E. (2017). Putting distributed representations into context. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(3), 359-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1211302
Petters, D., Hummel, J. E., Jüttner, M., Wakui, E., & Davidoff, J. (2017). Using computational models of object recognition to investigate representational change through development. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (pp. 141-173). (Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics; Vol. 28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43784-2_8
Wilner, S., & Hummel, J. E. (2017). Automating the encoding for the LISA model of analogy from raw text. 115-122. Paper presented at 28th Modern Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference, MAICS 2017, Fort Wayne, United States.
Horne, Z., Powell, D., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2015). Reply to Betsch et al. Highlighting risks of diseases shifts vaccine attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(49), E6727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517936112