Contact Information
Dept. of Psychology, MC-716
833 Psychology Bldg.
603 E. Daniel St.
Champaign, IL 61820
USA
Research Areas
Research Description
Gary Dell's work deals with how people produce and understand sentences, and how these processes can be modelled using neural networks. For example, his research on language production attempts to understand production errors or "slips of the tongue." He has developed a neural net model that makes predictions about the qualitative and quantitative properties of speech errors. These predictions are tested using experimental procedures in which subjects produce words and sentences under controlled conditions. A particularly interesting aspect of the model is that it can be used to understand patterns of behavior resulting from brain damage. By changing the processing characteristics of the model, one can produce speech error patterns that are characteristic of certain types of aphasic patients.
Education
Ph.D. from the University of Toronto
Courses Taught
Cognitive Science Proseminar
Connectionist models in psychology
Language production
External Links
Recent Publications
Hwang, S., Dell, G. S., & Fisher, C. L. (2022). Is the learning of artificial phonotactic rules interfered with by the concurrent experience of English?. 2207-2213. Paper presented at 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity, CogSci 2022, Toronto, Canada.
Middleton, E. L., Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., & Brecher, A. (2022). Learning from errors: Exploration of the monitoring learning effect. Cognition, 224, [105057]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105057
Dell, G. S., Kelley, A. C., Hwang, S., & Bian, Y. (2021). The adaptable speaker: A theory of implicit learning in language production. Psychological review, 128(3), 446-487. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000275
Bian, Y., & Dell, G. S. (2020). Novel stress phonotactics are learnable by English speakers: Novel tone phonotactics are not. Memory and Cognition, 48(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-01000-9
Jacobs, C. L., Loucks, T. M., Watson, D. G., & Dell, G. S. (2020). Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(4), 485-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1693051
